April 17th 2010

What has Simon Cowell got against cruise ships?

Talent show host Simon Cowell had another go at cruise ship entertainment the other day, criticising some of his contestants for being “too cruise ship”. Using cruise ships as a term of abuse is nothing new for Cowell and I just wonder what he is basing his opinions on. Perhaps his parents took him on a ship 30 years ago and he thinks nothing’s changed. Does he know for example that the platinum selling pop star Rhiannon has worked on a cruise ship? How about Tony Bennett? Would he call James Taylor “too cruise ship”. They have all worked on ships in the last twelve months. Perhaps he’d be interested to know that the Broadway smash “Hairspray” is currently wowing audiences nightly in one 1380 capacity state of the art theatre at sea.We should remember that we’re talking about the man who introduced the British public to a Michael Jackson impersonator dressed as Darth Vader and two teenage boys with alarming hair and too much energy jumping around insanely for three minutes. Two acts unlikely to be invited to grace the stage of any ship I know.

“remember that we’re talking about a man who introduced us to a girl and her dancing dog”

So what does Cowell actually mean when he says, “too cruise ship”? Tired lounge acts churning out wallpaper music? Maybe he saw Frasier Crane’s encounter with “The Barracuda” and thinks all cruise ship acts are washed up has-beens who spend more time working on their tans than their acts. Who knows?

It is true that cruise entertainment does present some unique challenges. Audiences can be very mixed, from young families on a budget to retired executives, and people from all parts of the globe with their own cultural references and languages – each with their own idea of what constitutes good entertainment. With such a wide degree of tastes and expectations it’s often necessary to appeal to as many people as possible by presenting a ‘safe’ selection of inoffensive comedy, music and dance. Anything too specific risks alienating sections of the audience. Larger ships solve this by offering something for everyone in multiple venues. Choice is paramount and it’s easy to forget you’re on a ship at all. Celebrity’s Solstice class, for example, offers seven highly diverse entertainment venues, so on any evening you could choose to enjoy a classical recital, a seventies dance band or full production show. It’s up to you

Many lines have been successful in segmenting the market to focus on one particular demographic. SAGA Cruises are exclusive to the over-50s, Royal Caribbean markets itself to adventure-seeking families and Cunard attracts those looking for traditional quality and elegance. Queen Victoria’s “Celtic Dreams”, for example, proves that it’s possible to get standing ovations without ever resorting to cliché. A rare feat for any show.

Talent competitions like Cowell’s are in part responsible for the demise of quality light entertainment on television where there were once plenty of opportunities for good acts of real substance and longevity to develop a national profile. Not any more. The social club scene has all but disappeared and without a “name” topping the bill, a regional theatre tour is a huge gamble. Cruise ships are one of the few places where skilled entertainers of real substance can still ply their trade. When Simon Cowell criticises his contestants for being “too cruise ship” he is denigrating a huge industry that’s giving valuable work opportunities to literally 1000s of performers.

Given a choice between a girl with a jumping dog or Tony Bennett – I know what I’d choose.

3 Responses to “What has Simon Cowell got against cruise ships?”

  1. Maggie Moone says:

    Hi Gary

    Firstly, congratulations on your articulate defence of entertainment on board cruise ships. Not only are you a great singer, but also someone who can justifiably argue the merits of performers on the high seas through experience.

    Cruise ships offer the opportunity to artistes (who might otherwise be out of work in the UK or elsewhere) of perfecting their art to an audience who has come to expect the very best in performance. This audience, consisting of people of all ages, has “seen it all”, has diverse taste in music and entertainment, and probably welcomes a change from the same tired old formula of churning out “pop stars” on shows like X Factor to the interruptions of a primed screaming mob at every given moment.

    Whilst I have always been a fan of Simon Cowell and highly respect what he has brought to entertainment, I do not quite understand how he can make a sweeping comment denying the talent of any cruise ship performer when, in fact, he has probably never been on a cruise ship or witnessed the talented artistes on board. Certainly not in recent years!

    There are many X-Factor contestants and winners who may find themselves turning to cruise ships in future years for work once their hour of fame and glory has passed and they can no longer “sell records”, which is the only criteria that ‘floats the boat’ of music moguls like Simon Cowell and Louis Walsh.

  2. Rosanne says:

    I totally agree with you, Gary.
    I really resent ignorant comments like that.
    Competition to perform on cruise ships is now just as competitive as performing in the West End (perhaps Mr Cowell has never seen the lines for open cruise ship auditions). The money is actually better than most West End jobs, and singers are required to be more versatile because they will usually be required to perform several shows, not just one. It takes a lot of talent to win that kind of role.
    Recently I’ve been performing in a fairly low-budget comedy show (just to get something on the CV that proved I am also a versatile actress, and not just a singer). What really pissed me off was the musical director would frequently make comments like ‘don’t sing it so cruise-ship,’ or ‘you sang that line too cruise-shippy.’ Finally I lost my temper and pointed out that ‘singing it too cruise-shippy just bought me a house.’ The fact that he seemed to think that MDing a small-time production allowed him to look down his nose at cruise ship work really pissed me off, because as far as I’m concerned, it’s the other way around.
    I also agree with the other Ros, above.

  3. Ros says:

    Well said Gary. If it wasn’t for cruise ships half of show biz would be out of a job. Not because they’re not good but because theatres and good night clubs just ain’t around no’ mo’. More’s the pity.

Leave a Reply

Notify me of follow-up comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

« Go to the complete Blog archive

TRAVEL & LIFESTYLE

February 3rd 2012

And The Rest Is History. Michael Bublé, the lucky fisherman. (Read)

January 13th 2012

No Ball Games (Read)

January 1st 2012

And The Rest Is History: Inspirational Inventor, Trevor Baylis (Read)

December 9th 2011

Risking A Heavenly Thunderbolt (Read)

November 9th 2011

Featured on Travel Web Site (Read)

More Travel & Lifestyle entries »

February 2nd 2012

Boisdale of Canary Wharf confirmed for 27th April (Read)

January 23rd 2012

Ronnie Scott’s date changed (Read)

January 9th 2012

New show on sale in Cleethorpes (Read)

January 7th 2012

Seen a show? Leave a (nice) comment. (Read)

December 22nd 2011

Thank you to my wonderful sponsors (Read)

More Music entries »